What is the difference between a mediator and a divorce lawyer?

What is the difference between a mediator and a divorce lawyer?

A divorce attorney will advise you on specific aspects of the law and argue on your behalf during settlement negotiations and in court. A divorce mediator works with both you and your spouse but does not take sides. The mediator helps the two of you communicate with one another and reach an amicable resolution.

Is a mediator better than a lawyer?

A lawyer can only represent one party and their job is to advocate or “fight” for their one client. A mediator is a neutral third party and doesn’t take sides – in divorce mediation, they help both spouses reach an agreement best for them and their children.

Which is better mediation or arbitration?

Many people report a higher degree of satisfaction with mediation than with arbitration or other court processes because they can control the result and be part of the resolution. Arbitration, on the other hand, is generally a more formal process than mediation.

What are some disadvantages of mediation compared with arbitration?

A disadvantage to mediation is that the parties may not be able to come together on an agreement and will end up in court anyway. Arbitration is a more formal process for resolving disputes. Arbitration often follows formal rules of procedure and the arbitrator may have legal training that a mediator does not.

What are the pros and cons of arbitration compared to mediation?

Arbitration is much faster than litigation. Unlike mediation, the arbitrator has the authority to issue binding rulings on the two sides, even if one side doesn’t want to cooperate.