How do you answer a discovery question?
Table of Contents
How do you answer a discovery question?
Be concise when answering narrative questions. Provide accurate, complete information, but do not answer more than is necessary. If adding some particular details will help your case, then include them. But do not feel compelled to include details that may not help your case.
What is a defendant’s request for discovery?
Discovery is the process through which defendants find out about the prosecution’s case. For example, through standard discovery procedure, they can: get copies of the arresting officers’ reports and statements made by prosecution witnesses, and. examine evidence that the prosecution proposes to introduce at trial.
Do you have the right to see evidence against you?
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
What is a Brady rule violation?
“A Brady violation occurs when the government fails to disclose evidence materially favorable to the accused. ‘ The reversal of a conviction is required upon a ‘showing that the favorable evidence could reasonably be taken to put the whole case in such a different light as to undermine confidence in the verdict.
What is the Brady rule?
The Brady Rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), requires prosecutors to disclose materially exculpatory evidence in the government’s possession to the defense. The defendant bears the burden to prove that the undisclosed evidence was both material and favorable.
Why is it called a Brady violation?
The motion gets its name “Brady” because of the United States Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland. This case says that in any criminal proceeding, prosecutors have a constitutional duty to give the defense any evidence that might show the defendant is innocent of the crime charged.
What is the difference between Brady and Giglio?
The case extended the Court’s holding in Brady v. Maryland, requiring such agreements to be disclosed to defense counsel. As a result of this case, the term Giglio material is sometimes used to refer to any information pertaining to deals that witnesses in a criminal case may have entered into with the government.
What are Brady List cops?
A Giglio or Brady list is a list compiled usually by a prosecutor’s office or a police department containing the names and details of law enforcement officers who have had sustained incidents of untruthfulness, criminal convictions, candor issues, or some other type of issue placing their credibility into question.
What is the remedy for a Brady violation?
Ordinarily the remedy for a Brady violation is the reversal of the conviction because the suppressed exculpatory evidence was “material.” After looking at the record, an appellate court would decide that the suppressed evidence created a reasonable probability of a different outcome such that confidence in the …
What are Brady documents?
Brady disclosure consists of exculpatory or impeaching information and evidence that is material to the guilt or innocence or to the punishment of a defendant. The term comes from the 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case Brady v.
Is withholding exculpatory evidence a crime?
California makes it a felony for prosecutors to withhold or alter exculpatory evidence. More than two years into a dispute over alleged misconduct by Orange County, California, prosecutors trying a multiple-murder case, the state of California has made it a felony crime to withhold exculpatory evidence.
What is withholding evidence called?
Spoliation of evidence is the intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding.
What is considered exculpatory evidence?
Exculpatory evidence is evidence favorable to the defendant in a criminal trial that exonerates or tends to exonerate the defendant of guilt. It is the opposite of inculpatory evidence, which tends to present guilt.
Do lawyers have to share evidence?
Prosecutors do not need to share their theory of the case with the defendant’s attorney, nor do they need to provide them with notes taken about the case. These are protected by the work product rule, which covers an attorney’s impressions, observations, and subjective thoughts about a case.