How do judges make decisions about legal cases?
How do judges make decisions about legal cases?
Trials in criminal and civil cases are generally conducted the same way. After all the evidence has been presented and the judge has explained the law related to the case to a jury, the jurors decide the facts in the case and render a verdict. If there is no jury, the judge makes a decision on the case.
What influences a judge’s decision in a case?
But additional legal, personal, ideological, and political influences weigh on the Supreme Court and its decision-making process. On the legal side, courts, including the Supreme Court, cannot make a ruling unless they have a case before them, and even with a case, courts must rule on its facts.
Do judges decide cases on the basis of what they personally think is right?
Our personal opinions or public sentiment about the merits or morality of certain laws simply are not factors in judicial decision making. We are charged to interpret the laws and to protect the constitutional rights of all citizens, regardless of power or position.
What is the judge-made law?
In law, common law (also known as judicial precedent or judge-made law, or case law) is the body of law created by judges and similar quasi-judicial tribunals by virtue of being stated in written opinions.
What are the three main rules of statutory interpretation?
In the construction (interpretation) of statutes, the principle aim of the court must be to carry out the “Intention of Parliament”, and the English courts developed three main rules (plus some minor ones) to assist them in the task. These were: the mischief rule, the literal rule, and the golden rule.
What is the golden rule of statutory interpretation?
The ‘Golden Rule’ of statutory interpretation provides that a court may depart from the normal or literal meaning of a word where it bears an absurd result.
What is the basic principle of statutory interpretation?
A basic principle of statutory interpretation is that courts should “give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute, avoiding, if it may be, any construction which implies that the legislature was ignorant of the meaning of the language it employed.”84 The modern variant is that statutes should be …
What are primary rules of interpretation?
The primary rule is to interpret words as they are. It should be taken into note that the rule can be applied only when the meanings of the words are clear i.e. words should be simple so that the language is plain and only one meaning can be derived out of the statute.
Why is statutory interpretation necessary?
Statutory interpretation is important so that they are unable to make their own judgement in cases. If they stumble upon any problem they cannot change the law therefore they cannot interrupt the flow of justice. In allows Parliament to be the law making body and court will then apply the law.
