What are two examples of cases where the federal courts would have exclusive jurisdiction?

What are two examples of cases where the federal courts would have exclusive jurisdiction?

Federal courts also have “exclusive” subject matter jurisdiction over copyright cases, admiralty cases, lawsuits involving the military, immigration laws, and bankruptcy proceedings.

What are the two kinds of cases heard in state courts?

How a case moves through the California court system. There are two kinds of court cases: civil and criminal. “Civil” cases are the cases in court that aren’t about breaking a criminal law (called a violation of criminal law).

What is the difference between federal courts and state courts?

The differences between federal and state courts are defined mainly by jurisdiction. Jurisdiction refers to the kinds of cases a court is authorized to hear. Federal court jurisdiction, by contrast, is limited to the types of cases listed in the Constitution and specifically provided for by Congress.

What are the three types of cases heard in federal court?

More specifically, federal courts hear criminal, civil, and bankruptcy cases. And once a case is decided, it can often be appealed.

Why do defendants prefer federal courts?

It’s no secret that companies sued as defendants generally prefer to litigate in federal court, not state court. Federal courts are presumed to be more predictable, more transparent and less subject to local biases than state courts.

Can federal courts overrule state courts?

Answer: No. It is a common misconception among pro se litigants that federal courts can revisit and perhaps overturn a decision of the state courts. Only if a federal issue was part of a state court decision can the federal court review a decision by the state court.

Are district court decisions binding on themselves?

District court decisions are not binding on state courts. State supreme court decisions will also be binding on federal courts that are interpreting the state’s law under diversity jurisdiction.

Is stare decisis binding?

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis ensures that cases with similar scenarios and facts are approached in the same way. Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

Are county court decisions binding?

County Court judges are bound by decisions of the High Court.